Tomada de decisão na alocação orçamentária a partir da teoria da lata de lixo:
uma análise dos municípios pernambucanos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21710/rch.v33i1.674Palavras-chave:
orçamento público, tomada de decisão, teoria da lata de lixoResumo
O objetivo deste estudo é verificar a existência dos fatores aleatórios dentro da estrutura organizacional que influenciam os tomadores de decisão, concernente à importância e satisfação na alocação dos recursos orçamentários e o seu impacto relacionado em cada área social que compõem o orçamento público, a partir das estruturas de acesso e decisão averiguados na teoria da lata de lixo. A metodologia realizada foi exploratória, por meio de um levantamento, e o universo foi composto por 36 municípios pernambucanos, obtendo-se resposta de 26 destes. Foi utilizado um questionário com a intenção de identificar o nível de importância e satisfação na alocação de 10 tipos de despesas orçamentárias, e assim, foram analisadas as estruturas de acesso e de decisão em relação à forma como acontece todo esse processo de alocação das despesas orçamentárias. Na análise dos resultados utilizou-se a estatística descritiva e o teste de correlação de Spearman. Como resultado, foi notado que os níveis de importância e satisfação na alocação das despesas possuem diversas correlações significativas de moderada a forte entre elas, mas quando verificadas as estruturas de acesso e decisão, o seu índice teve apenas uma correlação de nível moderado entre si. No geral, foi possível constatar que a tomada de decisão em relação à alocação das despesas orçamentárias não possui uma forte relação significativa, como expõe a teoria da lata de lixo.
Referências
Arora, H., Raghu, T. S., & Vinze, A. (2010). Resource allocation for demand surge mitigation during disaster response. Decision Support Systens, 50(1), 304-315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.032
Bendor, J., Moe, T. M., & Shotts, K. W. (2001). Recycling the Garbage Can: An Assessment of the Research Program. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 169-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401000041
Choo, C. W. (2006). The Knowing Organization: how organizations use information to cons-truct meaning, create knowledge, and make decisions (2. ed.). Oxford University Press.
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2392088
Cohen, S., & Karatzimas, S. (2016). Modernizing government accounting standards in Greece: a case of garbage can decision-making. Public Money & Management, 36(3), 173-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2016.1133966
Dorta-Velázquez, J. A., León-Ledesma, J., & Pérez-Rodríguez, J. V. (2010). Models of Muni-cipal Budget Allocation: empirical data from spanish municipalities. Public Budgeting & Fi-nance, 30(2), 24-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2010.00955.x
Fioretti, G., & Lomi, A. (2008). The garbage can model of organizational choice: an agent-based reconstruction. Simulation Modelling Practice And Theory, 16(2), 192-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2007.11.010
Fioretti, G., & Lomi, A. (2010). Passing the buck in the garbage can model of organizational choice. Computational And Mathematical Organization Theory, 16(2), 113-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-010-9070-6
Giaccone, A., Lascari, G., Peri, G., & Rizzo, G. (2016). An ex post criticism, based on stakeholders’ preferences, of a residential sector’s energy master plan: the case study of the sicilian region. Energy Efficiency, 10(1), 129-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9444-9
Gibson, D. R. (2012). Turn-Taking and Geopolitics in the Making of Decisions. The Garbage Can Model Of Organizational Choice: Looking Forward at Forty, 1(1), 33-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2012)0000036006
Hofstede, G. (1981). Management control of public and not-for-profit activities. Accounting, Organizations And Society, 6(3), 193-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(81)90026-X
Huseras, A. T. & Baltes, N. (2019). Considerations Regarding the Public Budget in Roma-nia. Ovidius: University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, 19(2), 747-754.
Jones, B. D., Zalányi, L., & Érdi, P. (2014). An Integrated Theory of Budgetary Politics and Some Empirical Tests: the u.s. national budget, 1791-2010. American Journal Of Political Sci-ence, 58(3), 561-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12088
Keohane, R. (2002). Intergovernmental Organizations and Garbage Can Theory. Journal Of Public Administration Research And Theory, 12(2), 155-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003527
Kilavuz, F., & Yüksel, C. (2019). Psychological and Sociological Factors Weakening Public Budget Awareness. International Journal Of Public Finance, 1, 127-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30927/ijpf.634944
Kingdon, J. W. (2013). Agendas, Alter natives, and Public Policies (2. ed.). Pearson.
Knudsen, T., Warglien, M., & Yi, S. (2012). Garbage Can in the Lab. The Garbage Can Model Of Organizational Choice: Looking Forward at Forty, 1, 189-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2012)0000036011
Kreiner, K. (2012). Organizational Decision Mechanisms in an Architectural Competition. The Garbage Can Model Of Organizational Choice: Looking Forward at Forty, 399-429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2012)0000036018
Kristiansen, M. B. (2018). Budget Reforms in Times of Austerity: a centralization cascade in danish central government?. Public Budgeting & Finance, 38(3), 58-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12191
Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners (3. ed.). Sage.
Kuo, H., Chiu, J., & Lin, C. (2012). Intelligent Garbage Can Decision-Making Model Evoluti-on Algorithm for optimization of structural topology of plane trusses. Applied Soft Compu-ting, 12(9), 2719-2727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.03.011
Lipson, M. (2007). A "Garbage Can Model" of UN Peacekeeping. Global Governance, 13(1), 79-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01301006
Lomi, A., Conaldi, G., & Tonellato, M. (2012). Organized Anarchies and the Network Dyna-mics of Decision Opportunities in an Open Source Software Project. The Garbage Can Model Of Organizational Choice: Looking Forward at Forty, 363-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2012)0000036017
Mukaka, M. M. (2012). A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical rese-arch. Malawi Medical Journal, 24(3), 69-71.
Raudla, R. (2014). Budgetary Institutions. In A. Marciano, & G. B. Ramello (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (pp. 154-161). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_517
Raudla, R., Douglas, J. W., Randma-Liv, T., & Savi, R. (2015). The Impact of Fiscal Crisis on Decision-Making Processes in European Governments: dynamics of a centralization casca-de. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 842-852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12381
Reddick, C. G. (2002). Testing Rival Decision–Making Theories on Budget Outputs: theories and comparative evidence. Public Budgeting & Finance, 22(3), 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5850.00078
Reddick, C. G. (2003). Testing Rival Theories of Budgetary Decision-making in the US Sta-tes. Financial Accountability And Management, 19(4), 315-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0408.00177
Ruane, J. M. (2005). Essentials of Research Methods: a guide to social science research. Wil-ey-Blackwell.
Sager, F. & Rielle, Y. (2012). Sorting through the garbage can: under what conditions do go-vernments adopt policy programs?. Policy Sciences, 46(1), 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9165-7
Shah, A., & Shen, C. (2007). A Primer on Performance Budgeting. In A. Shah (Ed.). Budgeting and budgetary institutions (pp. 137-178). The World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6939-5
Tamir, E., & Grabarski, M. K. (2018). Searching for Gold in The Garbage Can: decision-making on resource utilization in schools using the garbage-can model. Leadership And Policy In Schools, 18(3), 325-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2018.1450515
Tamir, E., & Grabarski, M. K. (2020). Surviving the reform: management usage of the garbage can model during implementation of reform. Journal Of Educational Administration, 58(3), 373-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2019-0169
Thesari, S. S., Trojan, F. & Batistus, D. R. (2019). A decision model for municipal resources management. Management Decision, 57(11), 3015-3034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0500
Tanil, H., & Kozan, A. (2019). A modified Spearman’s rho parameter-free test statistic for early detection of newly emerging phenomena. Communications In Statistics - Simulation And Computation, 51(6), 2822-2830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2019.1702211
Trondal, J. (2015). Ambiguities in organizations and the routines of behavior and chan-ge. International Journal Of Organizational Analysis, 23(1), 123-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-04-2013-0654
Yi, S., Stieglitz, N., & Knudsen, T. (2018). Differentiation and Integration in Organizational Learning: a garbage can model. Advances In Strategic Management, 177-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220180000040006
Zhu, Y., & Kindarto, A. (2016). A garbage can model of government IT project failures in developing countries: the effects of leadership, decision structure and team competen-ce. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 629-637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.002
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Cristiano Belarmino, Paulo Henrique Leite Valença, Carla Renata Silva Leitão

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.